| 3,286 | 11 | 36 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
Artificial intelligence is an important national strategy.Computing power infrastructure serves as the crucial “computing foundation” for the development of artificial intelligence technology,providing massive computing resources to support modules such as large-scale parallel computing of algorithms,algorithm model training,and model operation services,thereby promoting the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology.However,upon reviewing the existing literature,it is found that there are several challenges in the development of artificial intelligence technology,such as pressure on capital investment,lack of human capital,and insufficient technical foundation.Therefore,whether the construction of computing power infrastructure will solve these problems and thereby promote the development of artificial intelligence technology in enterprises is worthy of in-depth study.Based on this,this study takes the listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2010 to 2023 as the research sample,and employs the least squares method(OLS)to conduct an empirical test to examine whether the construction of computing power infrastructure can promote the development of artificial intelligence technology in enterprises and the mechanism of its effect.The result shows that the construction of computing power infrastructure significantly promotes the development of enterprise artificial intelligence technology.The mechanism analysis shows that the construction of computing power infrastructure plays a promoting role by easing the pressure of capital investment,improving the level of human capital and enhancing the capability of digital technology.The heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect is more significant in small and medium-sized enterprises and non-technical board companies.Industry heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect is more significant in manufacturing,technology-intensive and capital-intensive industries.Regional heterogeneity analysis shows that the promotion effect is more significant in the areas with low financial development,low educational resources and high computing power application.Based on the research results,suggestions are proposed from both the government perspective and the enterprise perspective.The policy suggestions from the government perspective include enhancing the regional computing power supply level and the level of computing power application inclusiveness,implementing fiscal policies such as government subsidies and tax incentives,planning regional higher education reforms,increasing the intensity of talent recruitment,supporting the aggregation of digital industries,etc.The development suggestions from the enterprise perspective include actively connecting and integrating computing resources,optimizing production and operation,accumulating relevant technical talents,strengthening digital technology capabilities,etc.
[1] 王林辉,胡晟明,董直庆.人工智能技术、任务属性与职业可替代风险:来自微观层面的经验证据[J].管理世界,2022,38(7):60-79.
[2] 何江,梁正,韩希佳.AI产业化与产业AI化:AI大模型产业生态的行动实践、变革趋势与前沿议题[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(6):49-63.
[3] 米加宁,李大宇,董昌其.算力驱动的新质生产力:本质特征、基础逻辑与国家治理现代化[J].公共管理学报,2024,21(2):1-14.
[4] 余东华.算力:数字经济时代的新质生产力[J].财贸研究,2024,35(7):1-16.
[5] LEE Y S,KIM T,CHOI S,et al.When does AI pay off?AI-adoption intensity,complementary investments,and R&D strategy[J].Technovation,2022,118:102590.
[6] BALLESTAR M T,GARCIA-LAZARO A,SAINZ J,et al.Why is your company not robotic?The technology and human capital needed by firms to become robotic[J].Journal of business research,2022,142:328-343.
[7] 孟凡生,赵刚.创新柔性对制造企业智能化转型影响机制研究[J].科研管理,2019,40(4):74-82.
[8] 吕祥,路驰,杨水利.数字赋能制造业智能化水平的影响研究——技术创新能力的中介效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45(7):149-166.
[9] CHENG H,JIA R,LI D,et al.The rise of robots in China[J].Journal of economic perspectives,2019,33(2):71-88.
[10] 余明桂,贺蒙蒙,张萌萌.人才引进政策、劳动力优化配置与制造业智能化[J].中国工业经济,2024(5):116-134.
[11] 许和连,赵泽昊,金友森.人力资本如何驱动企业工业机器人应用?——基于中国“高校扩招”的准自然实验[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(9):178-198.
[12] 陈勇兵,林雄立,李辉.社会保险缴费负担与企业机器人应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(9):49-70.
[13] SONY M,ANTONY J,DERMOTT O M,et al.An empirical examination of benefits,challenges,and critical success factors of industry 4.0 in manufacturing and service sector[J].Technology in society,2021,67:101754.
[14] 杨壮,吴福象.算力基础设施建设能破解“生产率悖论”吗——基于合作创新和劳动力技能结构的视角[J].经济学家,2025(1):56-65.
[15] 王华,谭鑫语.筑算促新:算力基础设施投入与企业新质生产力[J].中央财经大学学报,2025(4):5-23.
[16] 徐志伟,李国杰,孙凝晖.一种新型信息基础设施:高通量低熵算力网(信息高铁)[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(1):46-52.
[17] COASE R H.The nature of the firm[J].Economica,1937,4(16):386-405.
[18] 孙伟增,郭冬梅.信息基础设施建设对企业劳动力需求的影响:需求规模、结构变化及影响路径[J].中国工业经济,2021(11):78-96.
[19] 孔东民,陶云清.信息基础设施建设与企业投资——基于“宽带中国”试点政策的准自然实验[J].经济科学,2023(2):106-124.
[20] 赵星.新型数字基础设施的技术创新效应研究[J].统计研究,2022,39(4):80-92.
[21] 沈坤荣,林剑威,傅元海.网络基础设施建设、信息可得性与企业创新边界[J].中国工业经济,2023(1):57-75.
[22] 种照辉,覃成林,招汶珊.“新基建”对区域经济韧性的影响研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(12):25-36.
[23] GROSSMAN S J,STIGLITZ J E.Information and competitive price systems[J].The American economic review,1976,66(2):246-253.
[24] FUSTER A,PLOSSER M,SCHNABL P,et al.The role of technology in mortgage lending[J].The review of financial studies,2019,32(5):1854-1899.
[25] 叶永卫,陶云清,李鑫.数字基础设施建设与企业投融资期限错配改善[J].经济评论,2023(4):123-137.
[26] 王永钦,董雯.机器人的兴起如何影响中国劳动力市场?——来自制造业上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2020,55(10):159-175.
[27] 梁文明,李娜.数据要素集聚赋能数字新质生产力研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(10):13-23.
[28] 王海,闫卓毓,郭冠宇,等.数字基础设施政策与企业数字化转型:“赋能”还是“负能”[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(5):5-23.
[29] 牛子恒,崔宝玉.网络基础设施建设与劳动力配置扭曲——来自“宽带中国”战略的准自然实验[J].统计研究,2022,39(10):133-148.
[30] NELSON R R.Bringing institutions into evolutionary growth theory[J].Journal of evolutionary economics,2002,12(1):17-28.
[31] 姚加权,张锟澎,郭李鹏,等.人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J].管理世界,2024,40(2):101-116.
[32] 焦豪,崔瑜,张亚敏.数字基础设施建设与城市高技能创业人才吸引[J].经济研究,2023,58(12):150-166.
[33] 向仙虹,邹志雁,赵佳佳.数智基建的绿色价值创造:基于绿色全要素生产率视角[J].西安财经大学学报,2025,38(2):44-55.
[34] 袁淳,从阓匀,耿春晓.信息基础设施建设与企业专业化分工——基于国家智慧城市建设的自然实验[J].财经研究,2023,49(6):34-48.
[35] 黄群慧,余泳泽,张松林.互联网发展与制造业生产率提升:内在机制与中国经验[J].中国工业经济,2019(8):5-23.
[36] 王珏,祝继高.劳动保护能促进企业高学历员工的创新吗?——基于A股上市公司的实证研究[J].管理世界,2018,34(3):139-152.
[37] 吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界,2021,37(7):130-144.
[38] 赵宸宇,王文春,李雪松.数字化转型如何影响企业全要素生产率[J].财贸经济,2021,42(7):114-129.
[39] 袁蓉丽,李瑞敬,孙健.董事的信息技术背景能抑制盈余管理吗[J].南开管理评论,2021,24(3):139-151.
[40] 鲁桐,党印.公司治理与技术创新:分行业比较[J].经济研究,2014,49(6):115-128.
[41] 张成思,朱越腾,芦哲.对外开放对金融发展的抑制效应之谜[J].金融研究,2013(6):16-30.
① 该定义由2023年工业和信息化部等六部门印发的《算力基础设施高质量发展行动计划》提出。
(1)人工智能词典中73个词语具体为:人工智能,AI产品,AI芯片,机器翻译,机器学习,计算机视觉,人机交互,深度学习,神经网络,生物识别,图像识别,数据挖掘,特征识别,语音合成,语音识别,知识图谱,智慧银行,智能保险,人机协同,智能监管,智能教育,智能客服,智能零售,智能农业,智能投顾,增强现实,虚拟现实,智能医疗,智能音箱,智能语音,智能政务,自动驾驶,智能运输,卷积神经网络,声纹识别,特征提取,无人驾驶,智能家居,问答系统,人脸识别,商业智能,智慧金融,循环神经网络,强化学习,智能体,智能养老,大数据营销,大数据风控,大数据分析,大数据处理,支持向量机(SVM),长短期记忆(LSTM),机器人流程自动化,自然语言处理,分布式计算,知识表示,智能芯片,可穿戴产品,大数据管理,智能传感器,模式识别,边缘计算,大数据平台,智能计算,智能搜索,物联网,云计算,増强智能,语音交互,智能环保,人机对话,深度神经网络,大数据运营。
(2)该定义由中国信息通信研究院发布的《中国算力白皮书(2022)》提出。
(3)国家文件包括《算力基础设施高质量发展行动计划》《“十四五”信息通信行业发展规划》《全国一体化大数据中心协同创新体系算力枢纽实施方案》等。
(4)《全国一体化大数据中心协同创新体系算力枢纽实施方案》。
(5)根据工业和信息化部等五部委2013年发布的《关于数据中心建设布局的指导意见》,数据中心按规模主要划分为超大型、大型以及中小型三类。其中,超大型数据中心指规模大于等于10 000个标准机架的数据中心,大型数据中心指规模大于等于3 000个标准机架且小于10 000个标准机架的数据中心,中小型数据中心指规模小于3 000个标准机架的数据中心。
(6)详见报告中图20:2021年中国部分省份算力应用分指数。原图中仅显示排名柱状图,未展示具体数值,其中广东约100分,江苏约85分,山东约80分,浙江约76分,排名第五的四川仅达55分左右。
Basic Information:
DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20260104.001
China Classification Code:F49;TP18;F279.2
Citation Information:
[1]WANG Hua,GONG Yukai.The Construction of Computing Power Infrastructure and Development of Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Technology[J].Journal of Statistics and Information,2026,41(02):42-55.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20260104.001.
Fund Information:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“算力基础设施与企业高质量发展:作用机理、实施路径与政策优化”(24BGL066)
2026-01-05
2026-01-05
2026-01-05