| 2,502 | 6 | 48 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
In the context of promoting the comprehensive green transformation of economic and social development, the green transformation of the manufacturing industry is not only an inevitable choice to achieve the carbon peak and carbon neutrality targets, but also a critical link to achieve the high-quality development of the manufacturing industry.However, the green development of China's manufacturing industry is still facing problems in terms of insufficient financial, material and technical resources, and the pressure on green transformation remains relatively high.Therefore, how to alleviate the pressure of enterprise green transformation has become an urgent problem that needs to be addressed urgently.Although the financial sector has pointed out the direction for alleviating the pressure on enterprises green and low-carbon transformation from a financial perspective, due to problems such as information asymmetry in the capital market, the implementation effect of some financial measures, such as green credit policies, is insufficient.However, the development and application of fintech have provided support for finance to more effectively empower enterprises in the green transformation.In the “Fintech Development Plan(2022—2025)” issued by the People's Bank of China, green and low-carbon have been listed as the basic principle of fintech development, and it is proposed to focus on improving the coverage and accuracy of the green industry of financial services, and help the green transformation and low-carbon development of the real economy.It can be seen that fintech plays an pivotal role in the process of green transformation of manufacturing enterprises.Therefore, using data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed manufacturing firms during 2011 to 2022,and from the perspective of transformations in the financial field by fintech, the study explores the impact of fintech on the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises by constructing econometric models.The results of the study show that fintech development can significantly promote the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises, and the conclusion still holds after a series of robustness tests such as endogeneity treatment and replacement of core variables.The results of the mediating effect test show that the development of fintech can promote the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises through two channels: enabling the development of supply chain finance and improving the level of green credit.The results of the moderating effect test show that both environmental regulation and corporate ESG performance play a positive moderating role in the process of fintech promoting green transformation of manufacturing enterprises.Heterogeneity analysis suggest that in the samples of state-owned enterprises, enterprises in high-tech industries, enterprises located in low-carbon pilot cities and enterprises located in northern regions, fintech significanthy promotes the green transformation of enterprises.Based on the above results, the following recommendations are put forward: While continuing to promote the development of fintech, it is necessary to pay attention to the negative impact of fintech and strengthen the supervision of financial innovation products enabled by fintech; Deepen the supply-side reform of finance, explore the functions of fintech in different financial scenarios, and increase the support for fintech in empowering supply chain finance and green credit; The government should adopt multiple measures to continuously strengthen environmental governance through the use of digital technologies; Resolve ESG rating differences, promote the establishment of a unified ESG disclosure framework in line with China's reality, and strengthen the supervision of the ESG rating industry.
[1] 陈庭强,李先钊,李泽煜,等.能源消费、金融支持对制造业绿色创新的驱动效应研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(3):66-79.
[2] 甘行琼,许启凡,袁一杰.区域工业绿色转型试点、财政压力与制造业低碳发展[J].财政研究,2022(9):104-119.
[3] 李黎,雍会,王磊,等.数据要素嵌入、双元创新与制造业转型升级[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(4):31-45.
[4] GUO B N,HU P J,LIN J.The effect of digital infrastructure development on enterprise green transformation[J].International review of financial analysis,2024,92:103085.
[5] 李佼瑞,柳青青.新型工业化视角下数字营商环境驱动黄河流域制造业发展的效应研究[J].西安财经大学学报,2025,38(1):58-71.
[6] 郑万腾,赵红岩,赵梦婵.数字金融发展有利于环境污染治理吗?兼议地方资源竞争的调节作用[J].产业经济研究,2022(1):1-13.
[7] 高瑜,李响,李俊青.金融科技与技术创新路径——基于绿色转型的视角[J].中国工业经济,2024(2):80-98.
[8] 胡金焱,于露,刘茵伟.金融科技对企业绿色转型的激励效应研究——基于数字化和绿色治理的双赋能视角[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2024,44(6):93-109.
[9] 吴非,袁普盈,向海凌.金融科技与企业绿色转型——影响特征、作用机制与空间溢出效应识别[J].中国环境管理,2024,16(3):103-112.
[10] 成程,杨胜刚,田轩.金融科技赋能下供应链金融对企业价值的影响[J].管理科学学报,2024,27(2):95-119.
[11] 宋华,韩思齐,刘文诣.数字化金融科技平台赋能的供应链金融模式——基于信息处理视角的双案例研究[J].管理评论,2024,36(1):264-275.
[12] 郭俊杰,方颖.绿色信贷、融资结构与企业环境投资[J].世界经济,2022,45(8):57-80.
[13] 程志华,张珺.新《环保法》实施对企业环境信息披露水平的影响研究[J].西安财经大学学报,2023,36(5):69-80.
[14] 王性玉,赵辉.环境保护税改革对企业绿色发展的影响研究[J].科研管理,2023,44(8):139-151.
[15] 谢乔昕.环境规制、绿色金融发展与企业技术创新[J].科研管理,2021,42(6):65-72.
[16] 刘兴华,洪攀,史言信.ESG表现能否增强企业绿色创新?[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023,44(10):82-94.
[17] 孙娜,曲卫华.“双碳”目标下ESG表现赋能企业新质生产力[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(10):24-41.
[18] CHIU S C,SHARFMAN M.Corporate social irresponsibility and executive succession:an empirical examination[J].Journal of business ethics,2018,149:707-723.
[19] 郭品,沈悦.互联网金融对商业银行风险承担的影响:理论解读与实证检验[J].财贸经济,2015(10):102-116.
[20] 邱晗,黄益平,纪洋.金融科技对传统银行行为的影响——基于互联网理财的视角[J].金融研究,2018(11):17-29.
[21] 李逸飞,李茂林,李静.银行金融科技、信贷配置与企业短债长用[J].中国工业经济,2022(10):137-154.
[22] 宋敏,周鹏,司海涛.金融科技与企业全要素生产率——“赋能”和信贷配给的视角[J].中国工业经济,2021(4):138-155.
[23] 刘长庚,李琪辉,张松彪,等.金融科技如何影响企业创新?——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济评论,2022(1):30-47.
[24] 万攀兵,杨冕,陈林.环境技术标准何以影响中国制造业绿色转型——基于技术改造的视角[J].中国工业经济,2021(9):118-136.
[25] 刘金科,刘霁萱,晁颖.绿色信贷与低碳转型:资本整合还是技术创新?——来自准自然实验的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(6):151-171.
[26] 孙传旺,张文悦.对外直接投资与企业绿色转型——基于中国企业微观数据的经验研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(9):79-91.
[27] 李金昌,连港慧,徐蔼婷.“双碳”愿景下企业绿色转型的破局之道——数字化驱动绿色化的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(9):27-49.
[28] 周泽将,高雅萍.地方政府环保关注度与企业绿色持续创新水平[J].系统工程理论与实践,2025,45(1):17-35.
[29] 沈洪涛,黄楠.碳排放权交易机制能提高企业价值吗[J].财贸经济,2019,40(1):144-161.
[30] 韩少真,张田,李辉.智能制造能否有效促进企业碳减排[J].财经科学,2024(9):72-88.
[31] 马平平,张明,王龙可.公众环境关注与企业绿色转型:政府环境规制与企业内部能力的双重审视[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2024,34(6):112-123.
[32] 孙少岩,王笑音,高翠云.绿色信贷能发挥碳减排效应吗?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2023,33(8):37-47.
[33] 孙明睿,马融,马文杰.金融科技与企业ESG表现[J].财经研究,2024,50(12):92-106.
[34] 盛天翔,范从来.金融科技、最优银行业市场结构与小微企业信贷供给[J].金融研究,2020(6):114-132.
[35] 毛其淋,石步超.通向绿色发展之路:智能制造与企业绿色转型[J].世界经济,2024,47(9):152-182.
[36] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.
[37] 徐佳,崔静波.低碳城市和企业绿色技术创新[J].中国工业经济,2020(12):178-196.
[38] 尹李峰,李淼,缪小林.减税降费是否带来地方债风险?——基于高质量税源的中介效应分析[J].财政研究,2021(3):56-69.
(1)本文在应用stata进行实证分析中使用reghdfe命令,由于在对包含singletons样本中的面板数据进行线性回归时,得到的结果可能会夸大统计显著性,导致统计结果有偏,因此在回归前对仅包含一年的样本数据企业进行剔除。
Basic Information:
DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.2025.0027
China Classification Code:X322;F425;F832
Citation Information:
[1]LIU Xinghua,YUAN Qijing.Effect Pathways of Fintech Enabling Green Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises[J].Journal of Statistics and Information,2025,40(07):58-73.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.2025.0027.
Fund Information:
国家自然科学基金项目“中央银行数字货币对货币政策传导的影响和作用机理研究”(72103084); 江西省研究生创新项目“数字金融赋能制造业竞争力提升的作用机制研究”(YC2023-B168); 江西财经大学第十九届学生科研课题“金融科技对制造业企业智能化转型的影响研究”(20241203151107153)