| 1,711 | 0 | 8 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
Enhancing government digital service capacity is crucial for modernizing the national governance system and aligns closely with the initiative to “develop new quality productive forces based on local conditions” outlined in the 2025 government work report.Although notable progress has been made in the digital transformation of governments across China,significant regional disparities persist,alongside challenges such as insufficient digital infrastructure and ongoing institutional and organizational restructuring.Therefore,further investigation is needed into how to strengthen digital service capacity to synergistically promote new quality productive forces.Based on 30 Chinese provincial panel data from 2015 to 2023 and guided by the Technology-Organization-Environment(TOE)framework,this study constructs a configurational model incorporating seven factors(e.g.,digital infrastructure,government organizational openness,and intergovernmental competition)that collectively shape digital service capacity.Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis(QCA),this study identifies multiple pathways through which these factors jointly improve digital service capacity.Regression analysis is further applied to examine how these pathways drive regional new quality productive forces development.The findings reveal that no single factor is sufficient to generate high-level digital service capacity;instead,such capacity arises from the interaction of multiple conditions,with government organizational openness playing aparticularly critical role.Six distinct pathways are identified:a synergistic symbiosis type lightly promoted by government finance and digital technology application;a similar type driven by government finance and education;an organization-guided type facilitated by digital technology application;an environment-guided type supported by government finance;a diversified composite-guided type promoted by government finance in contexts of not-high civic literacy;and an environment-guided type driven by civic literacy in settings with not-high digital technology application.Five of these pathways enhance both digital service capacity and new quality productive forces development by unleashing labor productivity,reshaping production relations,and enabling innovative allocation of production factors.Credit marketization exhibits a positive moderating effect in four of the pathways,though it exerts no significant effect in the two environment-guided pathways.This study provides theoretical and empirical insights into the complex formation mechanisms of digital service capacity and its synergistic relationship with new quality productive forces,offering important policy implications for advancing national governance system modernization.
[1] 王岭.数字经济时代中国政府监管转型研究[J].管理世界,2024,40(3):110-126.
[2] 李乐乐,顾彤彤,秦强.数字技术对数字政府治理的影响路径:整合、驱动、赋能[J].中国科技论坛,2024(7):41-51.
[3] 李丽辉,杨林珂.政府数据协同治理研究现状和趋势[J].西安财经大学学报,2025,38(3):90-104.
[4] 张孜仪,赵金旭,吴佳正.嵌入式包联责任制:中国数字政府建设的成功逻辑[J].公共管理学报,2025,22(1):127-138.
[5] 祁志伟.中国数字政府现代化:逻辑、机制与转向[J].电子政务,2024(7):101-111.
[6] 钟伟军.公民即用户:政府数字化转型的逻辑、路径与反思[J].中国行政管理,2019(10):51-55.
[7] 权一章,陈一帆.数字政府建设的影响因素及推动路径:基于全国市级面板数据的动态分析[J].电子政务2024(3):54-67.
[8] 任弢,王欣亮,张家豪.政府数字化转型何以提升区域创新绩效?[J].人文杂志,2023(3):121-130.
[9] 杜运周,孙宁,刘秋辰.运用混合方法发展和分析复杂中介模型——以营商环境促进创新活力,协同新质生产力和“就业优先”为例[J].管理世界,2024,40(6):217-237.
[10] 韦彬,王鹏.数实孪生与整体制治相融双赋:中国式现代化政务服务的全过程智治——基于南宁市“智慧人社”的案例考察[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,46(3):153-164.
[11] 卢盛峰,田慧,李成.财政收入、支出结构激励与民生性公共服务供给[J].经济研究,2025,60(2):141-157.
[12] 邓崧,巴松竹玛,李晓昀.府际关系视域下我国数字政府建设创新扩散路径——基于“试验认可推广”模型的多案例研究[J].电子政务,2021(11):23-33.
[13] 渠慎宁,梁航远.新兴数字技术赋能新质生产力:核心机制与主要路径[J].技术经济,2025,44(2):58-66.
[14] 梁文明,李娜.数据要素集聚赋能数字新质生产力研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(10):13-23.
[15] 任保平,王昕.数字中国建设的绩效评价及其推进策略[J].统计与信息论坛,2024,39(9):23-34.
[16] AGUIRREGABIRIA V,CLARK R,WANG H.The geographic flow of bank funding and access to credit:branch networks,synergies,and local competition[J].American economic review,2025,115(6):1818-1856.
[17] COOPERMAN H,DUFFIE D,LUCK S,et al.Bank funding risk,reference rates,and credit supply[J].The journal of finance,2024,80(1):5-56.
[18] 铁卫,廖丽春.数字经济与财政可持续性协同发展研究[J].西安财经大学学报,2024,37(1):105-118.
[19] 向钰,赵静梅.基于数字经济的地方财政可持续性研究[J].中国软科学,2023(3):203-212.
[20] 胡税根,结宇龙,陈伊伦.行政审批制度改革的路径选择——基于30个省会及以上城市的定性比较分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2022(2):112-122.
[21] 刘淑妍,王湖葩.TOE框架下地方政府数据开放制度绩效评价与路径生成研究——基于20省数据的模糊集定性比较分析[J].中国行政管理,2021(9):34-41.
[22] 蔡湘杰,贺正楚.新质生产力何以影响全要素生产率:科技创新效应的机理与检验[J].当代经济管理,2024,46(10):1-14.
[23] 解学梅,朱琪玮.企业绿色创新实践如何破解“和谐共生”难题?[J].管理世界,2021,37(1):128-149.
[24] 杜运周,刘秋辰,陈凯薇,等.营商环境生态、全要素生产率与城市高质量发展的多元模式——基于复杂系统观的组态分析[J].管理世界,2022,38(9):127-145.
[25] DU Y,KIM P ,FAN D,et al.Zooming in and out for strategic advantage:slack configurations and R&D investments in high-growth firms[J].Journal of business research,2025,201:115729.
[26] 杜运周,刘秋辰,程建青.什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J].管理世界,2020,36(9):141-155.
[27] 龚银银,张永庆,郑苏江.数字创新生态系统驱动绿色创新绩效的组态路径研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2025,40(9):90-103.
[28] 申渊源,乔志林.新发展格局下企业核心竞争力提升的组态路径研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2023,38(8):111-128.
[29] 李纪珍,刘子諝.光伏企业何以在补贴退坡中实现“逆势研发”?[J].中国软科学,2023(10):34-43.
[30] 李燕凌,蔡湘杰.科技金融促进了工业新质生产力发展吗?[J].财经理论与实践,2024,45(6):10-18.
[31] 陈东晖,章一帆.金融新质生产力能否实现企业绿色发展[J].财经科学,2025(1):44-61.
[32] 焦豪,崔瑜,张亚敏.数字基础设施建设与城市高技能创业人才吸引[J].经济研究,2023,58(12):150-166.
(1)限于篇幅,新质生产力评价指标体系不予报告,如有需要可向作者索取。
(2)限于篇幅,VIF检验结果不予报告,如有需要可向作者索取。
Basic Information:
DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20251110.001
China Classification Code:F49;F124;D63
Citation Information:
[1]LI Yanling,CAI Xiangjie.Configuration Analysis of Government's Digital Service Capacity Synergistic with the Development of New Quality Productive Forces[J].Journal of Statistics and Information,2026,41(02):97-114.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20251110.001.
Fund Information:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字赋能农业农村公共服务高质量发展研究”(23VRC073); 国家自然科学基金面上项目“农村重大突发性公共卫生事件应急能力形成机理与提升路径研究”(72274059)