| 4,415 | 397 | 78 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
This paper analyzes and compares the impacts that various index harmonization and dimensionless methods have on the comprehensive appraisal results,then carries on measure to the relative effectiveness of the dimensionless method through building the index of compatibility degree.The result of positive analysis shows that,in linear comprehensive evaluation model,the subtraction harmonization method and the two kinds of dimensionless methods of the range method or Z-Score method are more effective than other standardized methods.Choosing the suitable index standardization method can effectively improve the accuracy of the results of comprehensive evaluation.
[1]丁昌慧,蔡辉,祁新辉.综合效益评价中数据的直线无量纲化方法[J].中国医院统计,2001(3):163-164.
[2]郝海、踪家峰.系统分析与评价方法[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2007:81-85.
[3]于鹏飞、王丽娜.财务预警中样本数据无量纲化方法的选择[J].会计之友,2005(12):43-44.
[4]焦立新.评价指标标准化处理方法的探讨[J].安徽农业技术师范学院学报,1999(13):7-10.
[5]张卫华,赵铭军.指标无量纲化方法对综合评价结果可靠性的影响及其实证分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005(5):33-36.
[6]郭亚军.线性无量纲化方法的性质分析[J].统计研究,2008(2):93-100.
[7]张松林,张昆.连续随机变量非线性函数的期望和方差的近似求法[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2008(8):107-110.
[8]宋光辉.统计学教程[M].长沙:湖南大学出版社,2002:382-383.
Basic Information:
China Classification Code:N945.16
Citation Information:
[1]ZHANG Li-jun,YUAN Neng-wen(School of Finance and Statistics,Hunan University,Changsha 410079,China).Comparison and Selection of Index Standardization Method in Linear Comprehensive Evaluation Model[J].Journal of Statistics and Information,2010,25(08):10-15.
Fund Information:
湖南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目《基于模糊数学方法的科技成果奖励优化评价技术研究》(2009001)
2010-08-10
2010-08-10