| 788 | 2 | 57 |
| Downloads | Citas | Reads |
The upgrading of industrial structure is conducive to economic growth and environmental protection in ecological protection areas.Vertical ecological protection compensation has a more direct and rapid impact on the industrial structure upgrading in ecological protection areas.It is of great practical significance to examine the impact of vertical ecological protection compensation on industrial structure upgrading.Based on the county-level panel data from 2010 to 2022,the quasi-natural experiment of the negative list system for industrial access in key national ecological function zones is applied to identify the impact of vertical ecological protection compensation under the background of industrial regulation on industrial structure upgrading by using the difference-in-difference model.The benchmark results confirm that vertical ecological protection compensation under the background of industrial regulation can promotes the upgrading of industrial structure, but the “running-in” of transfer payment of key national ecological function zones and negative list system for industrial access makes the policy effect lag by two years.The mechanism analysis shows that, vertical ecological protection compensation under the background of industrial regulation promotes the upgrading of industrial structure by inhibiting the industrial development of ecological protection areas and promoting the development of service industries in ecological protection areas.Through the heterogeneity analysis, it is found that the policy effect performs better in counties with low-level economic conditions and high financial pressure, and the policy effect of resource-based counties is better than that of non-resource-based counties.Therefore, it is necessary to improve the synergy between the transfer payment of key national ecological function areas and the negative list system for industrial access, to strengthen the policy effect of vertical ecological protection compensation.Optimize the system for the use of vertical ecological protection compensation, and promotes the tilt of vertical ecological protection compensation towards the service industry.Increase vertical ecological protection compensation in developing areas, and supports the industrial structure upgrading of low-level economic development, high financial pressure and resource-based regions.
[1] CAO H,QI Y,CHEN J,et al.Incentive and coordination:ecological fiscal transfers’ effects on eco-environmental quality[J].Environmental impact assessment review,2021,87:106518.
[2] 李淑瑞，薛钢.省以下生态转移支付制度环境保护激励效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2022,32(1):138-145.
[3] BUSCH J,RING I,AKULLO M,et al.A global review of ecological fiscal transfers[J].Nature sustainability,2021,4(9):756-765.
[4] 张海峰，沈坤荣，梁若冰，等.生态补偿奖惩机制改革对大气污染治理的优势效应研究[J].管理世界，2024,40(6):114-131.
[5] 侯孟阳，席增雷，张晓，等.国家重点生态功能区的环境质量与经济增长效应评估[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2023,33(1):24-37.
[6] 丁斐，庄贵阳.国家重点生态功能区设立是否促进了经济发展——基于双重差分法的政策效果评估[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2021,31(10):19-28.
[7] 卢文秀，吴方.卫生态补偿横向转移支付能缩小城乡收入差距吗?——基于2000—2019年中国典型流域生态补偿的经验证据[J].财政研究，2022(7):35-51.
[8] 鲁玮骏，张超.生态保护补偿有助于缩小城乡收入差距吗?——基于国家重点生态功能区转移支付的经验证据[J].财政研究，2023(7):82-98.
[9] CHEN S,HOU M,WANG X,et al.Transfer payment in national key ecological functional areas and economic development:evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China[J].Environment,development and sustainability,2024,26(2):4075-4095.
[10] CHEN C,LI W B,ZHENG L,et al.Exploring the impacts of spatial regulation on environmentally sustainable development:a new perspective of quasi—experimental evaluation based on the National Key Ecological Function Zones in China[J].Sustainable development,2024,32(1):404-424.
[11] 谢婷婷.国家重点生态功能区如何实现环境保护与经济发展的平衡[J].世界经济，2024(5):34-63.
[12] 金声甜，李小花.国家重点生态功能区设立对县域碳排放强度的影响——以长江经济带为例[J].经济地理，2023,43(9):139-147.
[13] 张正平，赵魏兰.数字金融是否促进了县域产业结构升级?——基于网商银行进入农村市场的准自然实验[J].财经论丛，2024(3):47-57.
[14] 魏滨辉，罗明忠，曾春影.劳动力返乡创业与县域产业结构升级：理论线索与经验证据[J].中国农村经济，2023(10):26-48.
[15] 李波，赵骏宇，靳取.返乡创业如何促进县域产业结构升级——基于政策试点的准自然实验[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(3):34-43.
[16] 高同彪，刘云达.重点生态功能区县域经济发展问题研究[J].经济纵横，2019(12):59-65.
[17] 刘宁，张洪烈，王琳琳.中国县域产业重叠测度与影响因素研究[J].统计与信息论坛，2023,38(6):52-63.
[18] 张军，樊海潮，许志伟，等.GDP增速的结构性下调：官员考核机制的视角[J].经济研究，2020,55(5):31-48.
[19] 贾俊雪，应世为.财政分权与企业税收激励——基于地方政府竞争视角的分析[J].中国工业经济，2016(10):23-39.
[20] 刘俸奇，张同斌.财政收支结构变动、产业结构转型与环境质量改善[J].财政研究，2020(10):57-73.
[21] 林诗贤，祁毓.区位导向型生态环境政策的激励效应及策略选择[J].财政研究，2021(6):85-103.
[22] 张韩，王雄元，张琳琅.市场准入管制放松与供给侧去产能——基于负面清单制度试点的准自然实验[J].财经研究，2021,47(7):93-107.
[23] 杨秋月，刘萧萧，李佐军.生态转移支付的碳减排效应研究——基于国家重点生态功能区转移支付的经验研究[J].财经研究，2024,50(4):34-48.
[24] 许光建，魏嘉希.我国重点生态功能区产业准入负面清单制度配套财政政策研究[J].中国行政管理，2019(1):10-16.
[25] 李健.数字经济、要素市场化与产业结构转型升级[J].统计与信息论坛，2024,39(5):31-44.
[26] 叶胥，王鹏帆，毛中根.消费升级的产业结构升级效应研究[J].统计与信息论坛，2023,38(11):17-31.
[27] 彭肖肖，彭刚，沈亚楠.高质量发展视角下产业结构高级化测算研究[J].统计与信息论坛，2024,39(5):16-30.
[28] 干春晖，郑若谷，余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究，2011,46(5):4-16.
[29] 周振华.论产业结构分析的基本理论框架[J].中国经济问题，1990(1):1-8.
[30] 于斌斌.产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应——基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J].中国工业经济，2015(12):83-98.
[31] 魏龙，王翼祥，蔡培民.制造强国战略能否提升供应链安全稳定水平——基于风险分散视角[J].经济学家，2024(5):97-107.
[32] 游珍，封志明，杨艳昭.中国1km地形起伏度数据集[J].全球变化数据学报，2018,2(2):151-155.
[33] 刘振，李伟，刘盛和.中国区域人口收缩对经济增长的影响及形成机理[J].地理研究，2024,43(4):949-965.
[34] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济，2022(5):100-120.
[35] 卢文秀，吴方.卫生态补偿能够促进农民增收吗——基于2008—2019年新安江流域试点的经验数据[J].农业技术经济，2023(11):4-18.
[36] 孙晓华，郑辉，于润群，等.资源型城市转型升级：压力测算与方向选择[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2020,30(4):54-62.
[37] 于潇，林建鑫.公众环境关注是否促进减污降碳协同增效?——来自居民与企业的机制考察[J].西安财经大学学报，2024,37(3):55-67.
Basic Information:
DOI：10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20250609.002
China Classification Code:X321;F121.3
Citation Information:
[1]WANG Yeqiang,LUO Yangfan.Vertical Ecological Protection Compensation and Industrial Structure Upgrading[J].Journal of Statistics and Information,2025,40(08):51-61.DOI:10.20207/j.cnki.1007-3116.20250609.002.
Fund Information:
国家自然科学基金青年项目“异质性环境规制对减污降碳协同增效的影响：作用机理、效应评估与路径优化”(7230031237); 中国社会科学院研究所创新工程项目(A类)“生态文明范式下协同推进降碳减污扩绿增长机制研究”(2023STSA01)
2025-06-10
2025-06-10
2025-06-10